Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Charles Beck's avatar

A lot of great advice here! Insurance is better to have and not need than need and not have. To that point, there is a HUGE difference between Full Replacement Coverage and Actual Cash Value.

When I bought my first two properties, on the same street that the author’s upstate project is on, the difference in monthly premium between Full Replacement and Actual Cash Value was about $150 per month ($300 instead of $150).

When a woman blew up her kitchen cooking methamphetamine and destroyed four buildings (two belonging to me) the insurance company paid out more than 3x as much with the full replacement coverage than they would have if we were only insured for the actual cash value of what was lost.

With that said, your contractor’s insurance protects you from the errors that all humans are prone to making, not just their “stupidity.”

As a contractor, I wish many times that I had asked a customer for references from other contractors they have hired in the past, solely to make sure that the customer has a history of paying on time and being fair.

This too would be a form of insurance to protect you against a client’s greed and proclivity to engage in unfair business practice.

Surely this may add some friction to your customer relationship, but clients who balk or walk away may not have been worth doing business with in the first place.

And ironically the clients with the greatest ability to pay also tend to be the ones most likely to not pay or withhold part of a final payment.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts